The Students’ Perception of Using ChatGPT Towards English Language Learning

Authors

  • Mohammad Hakamul Ulum A Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Fera Zasrianita Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Hanura Febriani Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i1.1255

Keywords:

ChatGPT, English Language Learning, Students’ Perception, UTAUT2

Abstract

This research seeks to explore the perception of the fourth-semester Social Sciences students regarding the use of ChatGPT as a tool for English language learning at UINFAS Bengkulu, particularly concerning learning autonomy, critical thinking skills, and ethical considerations. The study utilized a descriptive qualitative method within the UTAUT2 framework. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis with ten purposively sampled participants. Students largely view ChatGPT primarily as a transactional tool for quickly gaining access to vocabulary, translation, and even the completion of assignments. While there are perceived outputs and limitations such as inaccuracies (90% of respondents), risks of output creativity (70%) that are noted, there is still a practical adoption owing to the device’s usability and immediacy. Performance expectancy along with peer influence, hedonic motivation, and institutional guidance that is absent also remain as key adoption drivers. There are fears of stunting personal initiative and promoting skill stagnation through unrestricted autonomous control. This study applies UTAUT2 for the first time regarding the use of ChatGPT in learning English in a non-Western multilingual setting—Indonesia. It constructs distinct user profiles “critical pragmatists,” “intellectual minimalists and describes “critical passivity,” which is the behavioral unresponsiveness to limitations of awareness, which has not been captured in previous literature. The research results set forth tangible approaches to address the AI-academic integrity imbalance, such as the development of pedagogical frameworks incorporating AI, curricula on digital literacy, and institutional governance. This addresses the myriad shortcomings of the theories of acceptance of technology and is a contribution towards Global South educational settings grappled with AI incorporation.

References

Ahmadi, D. M. R. (2018). The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

Annisa, A. (2024). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artifical Intelligence ( AI ) ChatGPT sebagai Sumber Informasi Tugas Kuliah Program Studi Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam. 130.

Annur, Y. F., & Sujarwati, I. (2023). The Perception of Students towards ChatGPT in the University of Bengkulu: A Descriptive Study. Beyond Words, 11(2), 44–57.

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Octavia, A., Wahyuni, S., Danibao, B. K., & Wibowo, Y. G. (2024). ChatGPT acceptance and use through UTAUT and TPB: A big survey in five Indonesian Universities. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10(July), 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101136

Imran, A. A., & Lashari, A. A. (2023). Exploring the World of Artificial Intelligence: The Perception of the University Students about ChatGPT for Academic Purpose. Global Social Sciences Review, VIII(I). https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).34

Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1

Journal, I., & Ed, M. B. (2024). International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews Artificial Intelligence in Educational Systems : From Early Computational Tools to Contemporary AI-Enhanced Learning Environments Dr Rupkumar Panda. 5(8), 3756–3760.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. In Learning and Individual Differences (Vol. 103). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Liang, J. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A robot-based digital storytelling approach to enhancing EFL learners’ multimodal storytelling ability and narrative engagement. Computers and Education, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104827

Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2023-May. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121

Rachbini, W., Evi, T., & Suyanto. (2023). Pengenalan ChatGPT: Tips dan Trik bagi Pemula. In CV. AA. RIZKY (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access, 11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423

Sun, T. (2024). The potential use of generative AI in ESL writing assessment: a case study of IELTS writing tasks. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2).

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Wahid, R., & Hikamudin, E. (2023). Analisis Penggunaan Chat-GPT Oleh Mahasiswa Terhadap Proses Pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pedagogik Indonesia, 1(2).

Wulandari Pranawengtias, U. T. I. (2022). Undergraduate Students ‘ Motivation On English Language Learning At Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 3(2), 27–32.

Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

Zhang, Y., Pei, H., Zhen, S., Li, Q., & Liang, F. (2023). Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) usage in healthcare. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gande.2023.07.002

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

How to Cite

Ulum A, M. H., Zasrianita, F., & Febriani, H. (2025). The Students’ Perception of Using ChatGPT Towards English Language Learning. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 6(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i1.1255

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)