Mathematical Literacy Challenges: Third-Grade Students’ Difficulties in Solving Multiplication Word Problems

Authors

  • Cut Farida Zuhra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Rora Rizki Wandini Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1698

Keywords:

Elementary School, Mathematical Literacy, Multiplication Word Problems, Problem-Solving Difficulty

Abstract

This qualitative study analyzed the difficulties experienced by third-grade elementary school students in solving multiplication word problems and identified the stages at which those difficulties occurred. Eighteen students from SD Salsa, Indonesia, completed five multiplication word problems. Students whose written work showed difficulty were then examined through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The evidence was organized according to five problem-solving stages: understanding the problem, identifying relevant information, selecting an operation, performing the calculation, and stating the final answer. Thirteen students (72.22%) completed the tasks without identified difficulty, whereas five students (27.78%) demonstrated recurring obstacles. Calculation and final-answer difficulties were the most frequent, affecting five students (27.78%) at each stage. Difficulties in understanding the problem, identifying key information, and selecting an appropriate operation each affected two students (11.11%). Two profiles emerged: conceptual difficulty, in which students could not interpret the problem or determine a strategy, and procedural difficulty, in which students selected multiplication correctly but could not calculate accurately. The findings show that success with word problems depends on the integration of mathematical language comprehension, conceptual understanding, and multiplication fluency. The study contributes a stage-based diagnostic framework that teachers can use to plan contextual practice, targeted scaffolding, and differentiated support in elementary mathematics classrooms.

References

Bolstad, O. H. (2023). Lower secondary students’ encounters with mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7

Chang, H. Y., Chang, Y. J., & Tsai, M. J. (2024). Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w

Chen, K. F., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, M. R. A. (2025). Precision diagnosis in virtual learning contexts: a predict-observe-explain-diagnose-based approach to scientific inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(6), 3569–3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10527-5

Cherney, A., & Belton, E. (2020). Assessing intervention outcomes targeting radicalised offenders: Testing the pro integration model of extremist disengagement as an evaluation tool. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide, 13(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2019.1680854

Daroczy, G., Meurers, D., Heller, J., Wolska, M., & Nürk, H. C. (2020). The interaction of linguistic and arithmetic factors affects adult performance on arithmetic word problems. Cognitive Processing, 21(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00948-5

Deslis, D., & Desli, D. (2023). Does this Answer Make Sense? Primary School Students and Adults Judge the Reasonableness of Computational Results in Context-Based and Context-Free Mathematical Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10250-0

Dunton, G. F., Do, B., & Wang, S. D. (2020). Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and sedentary behavior in children living in the U.S. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09429-3

Faisal, R. A., Jobe, M. C., Ahmed, O., & Sharker, T. (2022). Mental Health Status, Anxiety, and Depression Levels of Bangladeshi University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00458-y

Finn, V. (2022). A qualitative assessment of QCA: method stretching in large-N studies and temporality. Quality and Quantity, 56(5), 3815–3830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01278-5

Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024). Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8

Krebs, R., Rothstein, B., & Roelle, J. (2022). Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1

Lemmo, A. (2021). A Tool for Comparing Mathematics Tasks from Paper-Based and Digital Environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1655–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10119-0

Lomas, T., Bradshaw, M., Case, B., Cowden, R. G., Crabtree, S., English, C., Fogleman, A., Johnson, K. A., Ritter, Z., Johnson, B. R., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2025). The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing. BMC Global and Public Health, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9

Merga, M. K. (2020). “Fallen through the cracks”: Teachers’ perceptions of barriers faced by struggling literacy learners in secondary school. English in Education, 54(4), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1672502

Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The Self-Regulation-View in Writing-to-Learn: Using Journal Writing to Optimize Cognitive Load in Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Onieva-Zafra, M. D., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., Fernández-Martínez, E., García-Sánchez, F. J., Abreu-Sánchez, A., & Parra-Fernández, M. L. (2020). Anxiety, perceived stress and coping strategies in nursing students: a cross-sectional, correlational, descriptive study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02294-z

Ouyang, F., Xu, W., & Cukurova, M. (2023). An artificial intelligence-driven learning analytics method to examine the collaborative problem-solving process from the complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09387-z

Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9

Reuker, S., & Künzell, S. (2021). Learning diagnostic skills for adaptive teaching–a theoretical foundation. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1887432

Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Number 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5

Rönkkö, M., Maula, M., & Wennberg, K. (2025). Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(4), 963–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251315654

Roth, L., Nuerk, H. C., Cramer, F., & Daroczy, G. (2025). Can’t help processing numbers with text: Eye-tracking evidence for simultaneous instead of sequential processing of text and numbers in arithmetic word problems. Psychological Research, 89(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02069-x

Säfström, A. I., Lithner, J., Palm, T., Palmberg, B., Sidenvall, J., Andersson, C., Boström, E., & Granberg, C. (2024). Developing a diagnostic framework for primary and secondary students’ reasoning difficulties during mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10278-1

Saifan, A., Devadas, B., Daradkeh, F., Abdel-Fattah, H., Aljabery, M., & Michael, L. M. (2021). Solutions to bridge the theory-practice gap in nursing education in the UAE: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02919-x

Schulz, A. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7

Shaughnessy, M., DeFino, R., Pfaff, E., & Blunk, M. (2021). I think I made a mistake: How do prospective teachers elicit the thinking of a student who has made a mistake? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09461-5

Shimizu, Y., & Kang, H. (2025). Research on classroom practice and students’ errors in mathematics education: a scoping review of recent developments for 2018-2023. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 57(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01704-0

Shrestha, S., Sapkota, S., Paudyal, V., Moon, Z., Horne, R., & Gan, S. H. (2024). Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in Nepalese Cancer Patients Experiencing Pain. Journal of Pain Research, 17, 3741–3753. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S455852

Ulitzsch, E., He, Q., & Pohl, S. (2022). Using Sequence Mining Techniques for Understanding Incorrect Behavioral Patterns on Interactive Tasks. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 47(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986211010467

Wennberg-Capellades, L., Fuster-Linares, P., Rodríguez-Higueras, E., Fernández-Puebla, A. G., & Llaurado-Serra, M. (2022). Where do nursing students make mistakes when calculating drug doses? A retrospective study. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01085-9

White, S., Foster, R., Marks, J., Morshead, R., Goldsmith, L., Barlow, S., Sin, J., & Gillard, S. (2020). The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3

Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Sekula, P., & Ding, L. (2021). Machine learning in construction: From shallow to deep learning. Developments in the Built Environment, 6(April 2020), 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100045

Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005

Zhao, F. F., & Schuchardt, A. (2021). Development of the Sci-math Sensemaking Framework: categorizing sensemaking of mathematical equations in science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00264-x

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Zuhra, C. F., & Wandini, R. R. (2026). Mathematical Literacy Challenges: Third-Grade Students’ Difficulties in Solving Multiplication Word Problems. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 8(1), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1698

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.