Communication, Resources, Disposition, and Bureaucracy: Evaluating the Smart Indonesia Program Implementation at SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Lilin

Authors

  • Nursilawati Nursilawati Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Nila Kesumawati Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Dessy Wardiah Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i3.1569

Keywords:

Educational Management, Policy Communication, Policy Implementation, Program Accountability, Smart Indonesia Program

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Indonesia's Smart Indonesia Program (Program Indonesia Pintar/PIP) at SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Lilin, Musi Banyuasin Regency, using George C. Edwards III's policy implementation framework (communication, resources, implementer disposition, and bureaucratic structure). A descriptive qualitative case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis involving purposively selected participants including the principal, vice principal, school operator, student beneficiaries, and parents (total n = 22). Analysis followed the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. Findings reveal that PIP implementation has improved educational access for economically disadvantaged students but faces four key constraints: (1) communication barriers due to parents' limited administrative literacy and digital access; (2) resource constraints including inadequate digital infrastructure and heavy operator workload; (3) generally positive implementer disposition, though bureaucratic rigidity persists; and (4) a bureaucratic structure with clear role division but insufficient integration of standard operating procedures and follow-up documentation. The study concludes that PIP's effectiveness depends on the integration of all four Edwards III dimensions. Strengthening data accuracy, digital infrastructure, service-oriented dispositions, and accountable bureaucratic governance is recommended. Limitations include single-site design and reliance on self-reported data. Future research should compare implementation across multiple schools and regions.

References

Abdigapbarova, U., Arzymbetova, S., Imankulova, M., Zhiyenbayeva, N., & Tapalova, O. (2024). Monitoring Virtual Interactions of Teachers and Students in Social Networks. Heliyon, 10(19), e37559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37559

Agustino, L. (2020). Basics of Public Policy. Alfabeta.

Ardiansyah, M. (2022). Social Assistance Program Implementation Strategy in Secondary Education Environment. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 145–158.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Indonesia Poverty Figure Report March 2024.

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Karaferye, F., & Walker, A. (2025). How Cultural Context Shapes School Leadership and Its Effectiveness: A Systematic Review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251396683

Fernqvist, S. (2020). Street-level Bureaucracy and Categorization Processes in Social Workers’ Encounters with Parents Who Have Financial and Cognitive Difficulties. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1547218

Garcia-Arroyo, J., & Osca, A. (2021). Big Data Contributions to Human Resource Management: A Systematic Review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(20), 4337–4362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674357

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). Education, Knowledge Capital, and Economic Growth. In The Economics of Education (pp. 171–182). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00014-8

Luger, T. M., Hamilton, A. B., & True, G. (2020). Measuring Community‐Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review. The Milbank Quarterly, 98(2), 493–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12458

Marques, I., Leitão, J., Carvalho, A., & Pereira, D. (2021). Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature. Sustainability, 13(5), 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052566

Mazon, G., Pereira Ribeiro, J. M., Montenegro de Lima, C. R., Castro, B. C. G., & Guerra, J. B. S. O. de A. (2020). The Promotion of Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Top-Down Bottom-Up or Neither? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(7), 1429–1450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0061

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Qualitative Research Methodology. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. .

Mosshananza, H. (2021). Implementation of Smart Indonesia Programme (PIP) at SMP Negeri 11 Bandar Lampung. Demokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan UM Lampung, 1(2).

Nabila, N., Mauwa, N. K., Young, J. S., Ismanto, B., & Trisatyawati, S. (2025). Analysis of the Implementation and Impact of the Smart Indonesia Program (PIP) in Senior High Schools. NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v6i2.3359

Nadia, Kurnianingsih, F., & Setiawan, R. (2024). Implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program (PIP) at the High School Level in Tanjungpinang City in 2023. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.521

Pedro, E. de M., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2020). Bridging Intellectual Capital, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 12(2), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020479

Prasetyo, B. (2021). Evaluation of the Impact of the Smart Indonesia Program on Reducing Dropout Rates at the High School Level. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 10(3), 301–315.

Prihatin, E. (2025). Paradigm Shift in National Education Policy: Adaptation Towards an Inclusive Digital Learning System. Scientific Culture, 11.

Purnomo, A. (2022). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Social Assistance Distribution for Education in the Digital Era. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA, 10(1), 1–15.

Rizki, M. (2023). Bureaucratic Fragmentation and Delays in Disbursement of Student Aid Funds. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 11(4), 332–345.

Saputra, B. P., Suryani, E. I., & Yonawati. (2025). Implementation of the Smart Indonesia Card (KIP) Program Policy in Increasing Access to Education. Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(2), 1467–1476. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1264

Singun, A. (2025). Unveiling the Barriers to Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9

Suharyanto, T., & Pratama, Y. (2024). Student Retention Strategies Through Financial Interventions in the Agricultural Sector. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan, 18(2), 140–155.

Supardi, S. (2024). Power Relations and Media Narratives in Implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program: A Case Study of Policy Perspective in Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001634

Suparman. (2020). Implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program Policy in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 1(2).

Wahyudi, E. (2021). Implementor Disposition and Quality of Public Services in Educational Institutions. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 210–224.

Wanti, M., Wesselink, R., Biemans, H., & Brok, P. den. (2022). Determining Factors of Access and Equity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Equity in Education & Society, 1(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461221092429

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Nursilawati, N., Kesumawati, N., & Wardiah, D. (2026). Communication, Resources, Disposition, and Bureaucracy: Evaluating the Smart Indonesia Program Implementation at SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Lilin. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(3), 2063–2081. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i3.1569

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.